<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Email encryption for the broader public could be realized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.peijnik.at/2008/10/16/how-email-encryption-for-the-broader-public-could-be-realized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.peijnik.at/2008/10/16/how-email-encryption-for-the-broader-public-could-be-realized/</link>
	<description>Stephan's Free Software blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:18:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scotslawstudent</title>
		<link>http://blog.peijnik.at/2008/10/16/how-email-encryption-for-the-broader-public-could-be-realized/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>scotslawstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espi86.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-65</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you&#039;re suggesting connecting everyone&#039;s mail clients to a big public keyserver.  That&#039;s fine, it&#039;s hard to get people to use keyservers though and it&#039;s something than I&#039;m not sure a lot of people would be happy with.

How would you feel if you sent email and all your recipient got was &quot;Please install PGP&quot; ?  It&#039;s a hassle and that&#039;s going to annoy people, as soon as you include an option to remove this feature you&#039;ll have people posting &quot;How to stop **** from messing with your emails&quot; tutorials online, so that breaks it.

It&#039;s very difficult to get everyone to use encryption but I don&#039;t think the way to do it is with technology.  There&#039;s already ways to get keys from the internet so you don&#039;t need to have met someone and yet they&#039;re still only used by people who know they need them.  Education&#039;s still the only way to fix it.

Although, anything which messes up the government&#039;s warrantless taps is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you&#8217;re suggesting connecting everyone&#8217;s mail clients to a big public keyserver.  That&#8217;s fine, it&#8217;s hard to get people to use keyservers though and it&#8217;s something than I&#8217;m not sure a lot of people would be happy with.</p>
<p>How would you feel if you sent email and all your recipient got was &#8220;Please install PGP&#8221; ?  It&#8217;s a hassle and that&#8217;s going to annoy people, as soon as you include an option to remove this feature you&#8217;ll have people posting &#8220;How to stop **** from messing with your emails&#8221; tutorials online, so that breaks it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very difficult to get everyone to use encryption but I don&#8217;t think the way to do it is with technology.  There&#8217;s already ways to get keys from the internet so you don&#8217;t need to have met someone and yet they&#8217;re still only used by people who know they need them.  Education&#8217;s still the only way to fix it.</p>
<p>Although, anything which messes up the government&#8217;s warrantless taps is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
